But, then again, is it? I think we all know how abstinence is supposed to work. I’m pretty sure we all know how something like a condom is supposed to work. Both have the same basic goals in mind: no transference of STD’s and such and no pregnant chicks. Of course, the bigger issue is which one works the best. I guess it’s all a matter of facing reality. Which is more practical? Which is more likely to be used?
Ok, so, you have abstinence. In a perfect world, this would be the way to go. Hey, sex is great, sex is fun, and if we all could, we’d all be doing non-stop. Take the situation in Africa, for instance. There seems to be conflicting ideas on how to combat the AIDS issue there. Apparently, the U.S. seems to think (and by U.S., I mean the Bush administration) that abstinence is the way to go. Apparently “our” abstinence plan has come under fire by the UN, being referred to as a damaging “dogma-driven policy.” Can’t say I disagree, because, let’s face it, having your primary tool to combat AIDS being abstinence is not a plan that’ll end up with a happy ending. Read that article, I don’t feel like discussing it, and form your own opinions. Do you believe that funding religious groups that are opposed to condom use will be an effective way to wage war on AIDS?
Let’s face it, people are going to have sex. There’s nothing you can do about it. People who believe abstinence is the way to go are assuming that everyone is the same, that everyone’s “moral” center is in the same spot. Rather than attempt to attack the “moral” issue of sex, multiple partners, etc, why not go with a more practical, less threatening approach? Our current patent laws prevent any sort of widespread treatment of AIDS, and I don’t see these religious groups offering to pay for medical treatment when the abstinence plan fails. C’mon, what’s easier, taking the time to throw a condom on, or resisting primal urges that have been hardwired in our brains throughout the history of the human race?
Again, this is when a perfectly good idea, such as religion, is used to screw things up. If we all remember our history correctly, forcing ways of life and religious ideals was part of the problem in Africa all those years ago that’s made it the hole that it is today. I’m not blaming religion, don’t get me wrong, but it’s this superiority complex that I find irritating and sometimes infuriating that causes these issues. It’s the assumption that one way is better than the other way. Of course, I’m kind of doing this same thing, I realize that, but I’m looking at the reality of the situation. You’re never going to get millions of HUMAN BEINGS to suppress their urges. Just never going to happen, especially when the people asking them to do so have conflicting theological interests.
Just think about it.














