I think it’s time to say good-bye to the word “debunk.” Web sites such as Digg are filled with this god-awful word, from article titles to reader comments. Quite frankly, I’m sick of seeing it everywhere. I’m sick of seeing people use it to try and make themselves sound smart. I’m sure if I watched enough t.v., especially if it’s political commentary on CNN or Fox News, I’d be hearing and seeing it even more. It’s a word that just needs to go away.
According to Merriam-Webster Online, the word debunk means “to expose the sham or falseness of <debunk a legend>.” In other words, it means to disprove something. My question is, why not just use the freaking word “disprove” or use “prove” and “false” in such a way that you would be saying something like “I’m going to prove that statement to be false.”
If I’m to believe the Wikipedia article (who can truly believe those things these days) on my new favorite word to hate, someone who debunks (a “debunker”) is actually a scientific skeptic. Which begs the question: why are people using the word debunk (a little piece of me dies every time I type that word) more-and-more often when discussing political topics such as “truths” and “lies” about the Iraq war?
I suppose it could be worse. I suppose I really shouldn’t complain until people start using it in every day conversations. At that point, I’ll probably be forced to hurt those people. But, I lay the initial blame for the common usage of this word on its supposed creator: a one William Woodward, a novelist, who first used it in 1923 “to take the bunk out of things.” If I had a time machine, he’d be the first person I’d go back in time to “erase.”
Please. For the sake of my sanity and for the sake of your health, stop using the word.














